Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1989-31 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: tracyr@uunet.uu.net (jane smallberries)
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 89 11:14:04 PST
Subject: Oppenheimer and Kate
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
Relay-Version: B 2.11 6/12/87; site scolex
Reply-To: tracyr@uunet.uu.net (jane smallberries)
Sender: news@sco.COM
Someone posted about this recently, but I can't seem to find the original article... I too was surprised to hear Kate's comments about Oppenheimer during the BBC Radio 1 interview. When discussing the motivation for "Heads We're Dancing", she described the situation her friend found himself in (discovering later that the man he was seated next to was Oppenheimer). Kate said that her friend was appalled when he found out, because he hated Oppenheimer and "everything he stood for." It was my understanding that Oppenheimer was sort of forced into the position of project lead for the bomb, due to his scientific prowess. I thought that he resisted the whole time, and was even criticized (and later removed from the project lead position) for not wanting to drop the bomb in a populated area. In other words, I thought he was a good guy at heart, who was rather unwilling much of the time. Yet Kate (or her friend) implied he was Evil Incarnate. Do I stand corrected? Or was Kate missing some pieces of the whole situation? -Tracy uunet!sco!tracyr, tracyr@sco.com -- "What happens to the soul after death? How does it manage?" -- Woody Allen