Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1989-28 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: sharon@asylum.sf.ca.us (Sharon Fisher)
Date: Sun Nov 5 08:46:21 1989
Path: asylum!sharon From: sharon@asylum.SF.CA.US (Sharon Fisher) Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa Subject: Re: Interview-transcribing Date: 5 Nov 89 16:46:20 GMT References: <1883.AA1883@radlein> Reply-To: sharon@asylum.UUCP (Sharon Fisher) Organization: The Asylum; Belmont, CA Lines: 20 In article <1883.AA1883@radlein> ray@radlein.UUCP (Ray Radlein) writes: >Fair Use has *everything* to do with the actual purpose of the quotation, >and very little to do with the length of the quotation. I have seen Fair >Use cover chapters-long excerpts on several occasions, and I have seen it >cover the reproduction or quoting of *entire* works even more often. As >long as the *purpose* of the citation is academic or critical, and no >profit is being made on the transcription itself, then Fair Use is in >force. > >An example: A professor wishes to include a question on a Final Exam about >self-responsibility, as reflected in Poe's "The Imp of the Perverse." Since >the story is not in the class textbook (or perhaps the professor doesn't >want an open-book exam), he photocopies the story from out of another book, >and passes it out with the exam. This is perfectly covered by Fair Use. I'm not at all sure that your analogy is appropriate. Rec.music.gaffa isn't professors and students in a classroom; I think people are even stretching it to call it an academic organization. I know that other groups on the net have gotten in trouble for copying publications, so certainly the net as a whole isn't immune.