Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1989-16 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: adams%bosco.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (Jeffrey P. Adams)
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 89 22:24:55 GMT
Subject: KaTe and grammar
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: UC Berkeley Math Dept
Reply-To: adams%bosco.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (Jeffrey P. Adams)
Sender: usenet%agate.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44)
Okay, now we're up to three examples of Kate using improper grammar. Can we agree that, grammatical-wise [No flames - it's a joke.], she is not perfect? No need to invent stories explaining the phenomena. I must admit, though, that it bothers me greatly to see professional users of English, Kate included, make fundamental mistakes of grammar and usage. It also bothers me that so many people want to justify the perversion of formal rules of language. Some people claim that "You and I like Kate" sounds stilted and unnatural, but "You and me like Kate" sounds OK. To whom? Certainly not to me. It only sounds unnatural if you are uncomfortable speaking properly, and you convey this through your voice. If you pay close attention, you'll notice that lots of people you know speak properly and it doesn't sound unnatural. It amuses me that many of these same people complain about exceptions to the rules of grammar, yet advocate creating many more such exceptions by making "street English" acceptable. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jeff Adams "Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part adams@bosco.berkeley.edu that wonders what the part that isn't thinking isn't thinking of." -They Might Be Giants