Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1989-01 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: dsr@uvacs.cs.virginia.edu (Dana S. Richards)
Date: 3 Jan 89 17:52:38 GMT
Subject: Submission for rec-music-gaffa
Posted-Date: 3 Jan 89 17:52:38 GMT
Responding-System: uvacs.cs.Virginia.EDU
Path: uvacs!dsr From: dsr@uvacs.cs.Virginia.EDU (Dana S. Richards) Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa Subject: Re: Wilhelm Reich Date: 3 Jan 89 17:52:38 GMT References: <8812301653.AA06076@uvacs.cs.virginia.edu> <8901021457.AA16677@hop.toad.com> Reply-To: dsr@uvacs.cs.virginia.edu.UUCP (Dana S. Richards) Organization: U.Va. CS dept. Charlottesville, VA Lines: 24 In article <8901021457.AA16677@hop.toad.com> Love-Hounds@EDDIE.MIT.EDU writes: >Really-From: tim@toad.com (Tim Maroney) > >Dana clearly sees book-burning as a very minor thing, of no real import >as long as the books being burned are the right ones. I find this mindset >so incomprehensible that no possibility remains for real debate. He would >no doubt find better company in Jerry Falwell's Liberty College than here. I seem to be defending myself against things I never said. (I confess it is a good debating tactic: paraphrase in so an outrageous way as to leave the impression you are dealing with an idiot. Falwell would be proud.) I never advocated book-burning, or any form of censorship. I merely said medical fraud is a crime. I am sorry if you think that is controversial. >I can only repeat that any reading of the lyrics to "Cloudbusting" shows >that it concerns primarily Reich's arrest by federal agents, not orgonomy. No doubt this is meant to leave the impression the two things are unrelated. They are not. dana