Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1988-04 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: IED0DXM%UCLAMVS.BITNET@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 88 15:53 PDT
Subject: Yet another KT fanzine is out
Actually the revival of an old KT fanzine which had been reported as defunct in _Homeground_ and elsewhere. IED is speaking of _Under the Ivy_, a British-based Kate publication for fans who must have anything to do with Kate no matter how exploitive or shoddy. Love-Hounds may remember reports of the first five issues of _UtI_, the last one of which was published over nine months ago. Now there is _Kate_,_An_Under_the_Ivy_Publication_(Issue Number 6)_. No reason is given for the change of title, but the motivation is clear: _Under_the_Ivy_ was too obscure a title to attract the poor, fledgling Kate fan who is this group's prime prey. Also, no date appears anywhere in this twenty-odd-page b&w "glossy" magazine, but it was probably printed up very recently since IED's arrived via air mail. Unfortunately this doesn't mean that there is any up-to-date info in the thing. Far from it. The single column of "news" flashes consists entirely of minor miscellany culled and regurgitated from other fanzines, including _Homeground_ and _The_Kate_Bush_Club_Newsletter_. In fact, the text of the entire issue was originally written at least three months ago, judging from references to now-long-past events and release-dates. (For example, _KBVI_ is confidently expected in early Spring 1988!) Beyond that, the fanzine contains un-proofread copy, mostly dot-matrixed in something like 16 or 20 point type size (fills up the page with a minimum of words and effort). An "exclusive" interview with Kate, post-The_Whole_Story_, conducted by Harry Doherty, is actually taken from _Hurricane_, and is so poorly transcribed that whole paragraphs and sentences seem to have been omitted through sheer haste and incompetence. There is a ridiculous comparison of Thomas Dolby to Kate Bush (in which _Dolby_ seems to come out "on top"), and a two-page listing of "a Kate Bush fan's" (read the publishers of _Under_the_Ivy_!) record collection for sale -- nothing particularly interesting or rare, with all prices absurdly inflated. And a hopelessly incomplete list of Kate's TV appearances. Altogether this is a despicable piece of manipulative bootlegger-mentality drivel for Kate fanatics only. So if you see a fanzine called _Kate_ in your import shop anytime soon, _avoid_ it. -- Andrew Marvick