Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1988-03 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: IED0DXM%UCLAMVS.BITNET@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 88 18:13 PDT
Subject: MisK.
While admitting that Doug is probably right about the legality of unauthorized interview CDs, IED will continue to call them bootlegs until 1.) someone comes up with a better one-word term for such grey-area products, and 2.) someone convinces him that there is any _moral_ justification for the peddling of things from which Kate receives neither a percentage of the profits nor any say-so in their presentation. Crap like the new picture-CD interview disk are such blatantly exploitive ripoffs that "bootleg" is too good a term for them already. If they were to distribute them to real fans at cost, or alternatively annouce plans to donate all profits to the SPCA, IED would gladly applaud their industry. As it is now, though, they can rot in hell. [ |>oug strongly disagrees with IED's flawed reasoning. Kate participates in these interviews voluntarily. The whole reason she does the interviews is so that the interviewer will sell her interview to someone who will publish it. The interviewer will make a profit by doing this. The publisher will then publish the interview (in a magazine, book, or newspaper, or perhaps the interview will be broadcast on the radio or TV instead). The publisher will make a profit by doing this. Why does Kate consent to just giving away all this profit? Because it results in publicity and only costs her a bit of time. I, personally, fail to see the fundamental difference between making a profit by selling an interview in a magazine and making a profit by selling an interview pressed in vinyl. -- |>oug ] > 2) What the heck is Organon? I believe I saw a reference to it > once, but I've forgotten where. (For some reason Thomas More's > Utopia comes to mind, but my brain is rusty and it could mean > nothing at all). Could you be thinking of Francis Bacon's _Organon_? If so, you'd still be on a wild goose-chase (as IED was for weeks), because the name of the home of Dr. Reich was misspelled -- probably (though not certainly) by mistake -- in the _HoL_ liner notes and on the twelve-inch labels. The name was "Orgonon", and came from the bluish "life-energy" called "orgone", the location and manipulation of which was the primary function of the original "cloudbusters". > Organon was the New Englad home of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, the > famous psychiatrist who went sort of bonkers after facing > rejection by Froyd and other peers. He was persecuted by > the Nazis and the FDA. The FDA eventually did him in. > -- Doug Well, except that he was rejected by Freud (and a hell of a lot of other peers) because he was already _going_ "sort of bonkers" by that time. His major contributions to psychoanalysis are in the areas of the therapeutic effects of sexual activity and in the theoretical efficacy of psycho-therapy (mainly sexual counseling) for the masses in a socialist society. In both of these fields Reich was already venturing out onto the farthest reaches of his sanity, and the majority of the psychoanalytic community in Europe, comprising a large number of thoughtful, intelligent and more or less sane people, naturally grew leery of Reich. In the U.S., Reich's publications rapidly acquired all the hallmarks of advanced delusional psychosis (e.g., obsessively repeated references to flying saucers and other UFOs, convoluted theories about the physical and visible properties of "energy", faith in the magical healing powers of inert metal and organic substances when molded into an "orgone-positive" box-shape, etc. -- not to mention the relatively mild delusion that plain metal pipes carried the ability to bring rain when pointed at the sky!). On the other hand, the FDA did persecute him shamefully and for all the wrong reasons. Kate's views about the value and credibility of Reich's theories have always remained private. As she would have us believe, she was simply inspired by _A_Book_of_Dreams_, the memoir of Reich's son Peter. On the other hand, details in the song and especially in the video show clearly that Kate did quite a bit of research into the controversy surrounding Reich in the 1950s. > 3) When Kate becomes a "blimpo" between albums, just how large > are we talking about? Industrial strength Alison Moyet? Is this > a major factor in keeping her from touring? > Kate doesn't turn into Shelly Winters, but then she > doesn't look like Twiggy, either. On occasion she just > gotten merely nonskinny, and on occasion she has gotten a > little plump. Whether this has kept her from touring, I > cannot say. -- Doug Nowhere _near_ Moyet-size, have no fear! The worst she's looked in terms of chubbiness, in IED's opinion, was in the Canadian "MuchMusic" interview with Laurie Brown. There the light chosen for the interview was particularly unsympathetic, and incipient jowls were clearly visible. Remember, though, that for a woman of Kate's extremely diminutive stature a weight-gain of a single kilo would be quite noticeable. She does not pig out. Also, a mysterious photograph of a new, lean Kate appears on the cover of the latest Kate Bush Club _Newsletter_, so relax. > 5) Lastly, would Mr. Marvick like to tear himself away from the > Kate-Goddess for one moment and try to explain the significance > of the title to Morrisey's "Suedehead"? It has no direct ties > to the lyrics (available upon request to all those who hate the > guy and would never buy his records). As a bonus, he might try > to throw in how the video relates to all this (you know, Morrisey > in a bathtub, on a tractor, defiling James Dean's grave, etc). Sorry, Peter, and no offense intended, but no, he wouldn't like to tear himself away, at least not for Morrisey. In IED's view, Morrisey is a tiresome and extremely limited musical talent with far too much overt love of himself for his own good, and a twee, self-indulgent style of delivery that palls in seconds. So sorry, but adoration of the Kate-Goddess will continue unabated from this location until further notice. He was flattered that you asked, though. -- Andrew Marvick [ Uh, oh. I have a feeling that that last paragraph might cause a little heat.... -- |>oug ]