Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1988-01 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: IED0DXM@OAC.UCLA.EDU
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 88 10:40 PST
Subject: Ktrivia, mailbag
IED picked up still another in the continuing (never-ending) series of KT bootlegs the other day. This one was mentioned earlier by another Love-Hound some four months or so ago. _Kate_Bush_Live_at_the_London_Palladium_1979_ is a 3-record set from what looks like the same old New Yorkers. On this album they go by a name they deserve, "Pharting Pharoah Records". The album design is particularly noxious: on the front cover it features the famous (and copyrighted) photograph of Kate with ivy in her hair; and on the back, a collage mixing official photographs taken from music magazines (including the KBC Newsletter) with shots from the nude photo session of "'lookalike' Kate Simmons" which originally appeared in the U.K. edition of _Penthouse_ Magazine. However, there is no reason that IED can see for doubting the authenticity of this album's contents. All 24 songs from the Tour of Life concerts are included (spread over three records), as well as virtually all of the "incidental" music and poetry/prose readings, readings, chants, etc. (The Bristol bootleg, in its recent vinyl incarnation, manages to fit roughly the same amount of material into two records, but who's counting?) The sound of the Palladium set is no better than you'd expect, but the source does sound different from those of any of the other albums. As a result, it seems relatively safe to accept that this set originated from the London Palladium. > lyrics she had been planning to use, were not traditional, but > rather were owned by someone. She therefore got her brother Since she had mentioned earlier the A. L. Lloyd version, isn't it likely that her original plan was to use Keats's lyrics, which IED believes Jamie quoted from (the same that Lloyd used), and which are public domain? It wouldn't, therefore, have been that they were "owned" by someone, as much as that they just weren't as close to what she wanted as John's lyrics. [ No, John Bush told me that the lyrics they were going to use they thought were in the public domain, but they found out on very short notice that they were actually owned by someone, so John threw together his lyrics on the day the song was to be recorded. -- |>oug ] As for her remark that the whole thing was "a day's work," and that John just threw the words together, IED would just like to mention that Kate has very often minimized the labour that goes into her work. [ This was told to me by John -- not Kate. And he was very specific about the timespan. -- |>oug ] In an issue of _Dreamtime_ (sorry, no source immediately at hand) there's a quote about how "RUTH" was put together which makes it sound like the song was an hour's work, when we _know_ that it took a lot longer than that... > "RUtH": Paddy > "HoL": Del > "The Big Sky": JC > "Mother": Mother (!) > "Cloudbusting": Father > I think this works quite well! (With the possible exception of > "TBS", in which I can't see too much of a connection with JC.) > However, others may differ, or perhaps IED or some lesser authority > (such as Kate :-)) may have stated this before. Your idea of a "programme" for the songs on side one is very interesting, Jamie, but a little problematic. IED (who does not, by the way, feel quite _that_ authoritative, though he _has_ been insufferably know-it-all-ish for some time now) supposes it's possible that the different a-side songs were secretly "dedicated" to individual people in Kate's life. Anyway, your idea that "Mother Stands For Comfort" and "Cloudbusting" could have been dedicated to Kate's mother and father sounds good. Especially nice is your point that the last lines of side two dovetail back into side one. (Cf. my paper, "Venturing into the Garden", posted in Love-Hounds about a year ago, for a separate but related conclusion.) About "RUTH" being for/about Paddy, however, the connection isn't clear to this listener. "RUTH" is basically about a lover's difficulty in understanding and getting along with her/his partner, and her/his consequent wish that it were possible to switch places with the other's sexual identity, in order to understand the other's feelings better. Kate has mentioned the word "lover", IED believes, in the context of "RUTH" at some point. So perhaps both "RUTH" and "HoL" could be "dedicated" to Del? "The Big Sky" could be "dedicated" to her brothers, in that the song is about "the child in us all," as Kate has put it. Kate's brothers do make vocal appearances in the Meteorological mix, too. Kate has never pointed out that the first side seems to be a kind of suite on the theme of romantic, sexual, childish, maternal and filial love (in that order?). But she _has_ said something like "it's all about love." That's about as specific as she's likely to get... -- Andrew Marvick P.S. to Rob Stanzel: Had an answer for you but have been unable to send to your address in any form.