Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1987-04 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: rosen%ji.Berkeley.EDU@Berkeley.EDU (Rob Rosen)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 87 02:15:03 PST
Subject: Re: Eno and discrete arguments
Newsgroups: mod.music.gaffa
Organization: Khyai Udan Mas, Berkeley
> [Doug:] >Then, Mr. Rosen, what has been the point of all your recent postings? A very good question, indeed. The point I was trying to make, believe it or not, has very little to do with Eno, music, or IED. It has much more to do with personal philosophy. I originally issued the "Eno has SINGLE-HANDEDLY..." statement as an experiment. I wanted to see how certain people would react to that sort of statement, and then hopefully use their collective responses to make a point. (In all actuality, Eno is not my idol and I had no right to make the statement about Eno single-handedly creating the rebirth of minimalism in modern music. However, such a statement provided a convenient vehicle for the point which will soon be articulated.) The point I'm trying to make is that music is fundamentally artistic expression, and it just doesn't seem plausible to assign universal and absolute terms such as ``good'' and ``bad'' to any product of one's personal experience. It just doesn't make sense to me to describe Kate Bush's music as ``good'' while Madonna's is ``bad'' (I'm picking two somewhat random examples here). I could justify my apprehension toward abolutist statements through a long and rather tedious discussion of certain tendencies exemplified in Western philosophical studies, but that would be totally out of place in this newsgroup. It would also piss a lot of people off. It's also highly insulting to have someone imply that if I don't think what s/he listens to is ``good'' then I must be some sort of moron because his favourite music is ``so obviously good.'' To add insult to injury, my music is ``bad,'' so I'm doubly stupid for (a) not acknowledging the inherent goodness of his music, and (b) thinking my music is good when it's really bad. What it all seems to boil down to, then, is an expression of ego insecurity. If you've been following the responses to my recent postings, I think you'll find that they amount to expressions of wounded pride; certain individuals are reacting in a manner similar to the way I react when someone issues a statement which has insulting overtones or implications. I'm human, and so I occasionally get frustrated when people continually insult me, although for the most part it takes a long time for me to get irritated enough to take the somewhat radical step of actually TAKING TIME to RESPOND to these sorts of statements. I promise I won't do it again for the next year or so :-) In any event, as someone sagely said, ``let's shut the fuck up already.'' There are more productive things to be discussed. If we could somehow unwrap the holier-than-thou shell so that we can expose the infor- mation underneath, we would be much richer in knowledge. %%Rob -- Rob Rosen Computer Systems Support Group University of California rosen@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU (the syntactically correct address) ucbvax!rosen (for people who actually LIKE source routing)