Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1986-19 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: FULIGIN%UMass.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU (Peter E. Lee)
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 86 12:41:16 EST
Subject: A threat to the availability of live music
The following message was sent to our radio station (WMUA Amherst). It outlines a very real threat to the availability in this country of live performances by international musicians who are not mega-stars, and even some who are. Feel free to post it on any pertinent forum - the only way to stop this from happening is to let people know about it so that they can in turn voice their opinion. No author was credited for the message. --- Over the past few years, many of us have been disappointed on occasion when performers from other countries have had to postpone or cancel concerts because they were arbitrarily denied the H-1 permits they needed to work in America. Recently-proposed regulations of the Immigration and Naturalization Service could make this a more frequent occurrence, and therefore could have a significant impact on the types of live music available to us in this country. In the August 8 "Federal Register", the Department of Justice's Immigration and Naturalization Service proposed new regulations governing the granting of H-1 permits to members of the entertainment industry. This proposal would require that performers seeking admittance to this country demonstrate their "preeminance" either by having sustained international or national acclaim, or by being recognized by experts in the entertainment industry for excellence in a unique performing art, be sponsored by a non-profit organization, and be coming to this country for one period per year of 60 days or less. To be considered preeminent, a performer will have to present evidence that he or she : --has performed and will perform as a star or featured entertainer in a major production. --has achieved national or international acclaim, as evidenced by reviews in major publications. --has appeared in establishments which have a distinguished reputation. --has achieved extensive commercial success. --has recieved recognition from organizations, recognized critics or other experts in the field. --has commanded and now commands a high salary or other remuneration for performances. Obviously, these regulations could have a significant impact on what kinds of live performances are available to us in the future. It is easy to see that many performers will be hard pressed to demonstrate that they have achieved commercial success, or to prove that they earn high salaries when compared to performers in other fields. It is also apparent that it will be difficult for performers to build a significant American following, and survive economically while doing so, when restricted to a single U.S. visit of 60 days or less per year, under the sponsorship of a non-profit organization. If you feel strongly about maintaining the environment of cultural exchange which has been growing over the past few years, and about preserving your right to choose the kind of live music available to you, please write TODAY to the Immigration and Naturalization Service, address below, and to your Senators, letting them know how you feel about this issue. We have all been fortunate to have experienced the music of other lands and cultures through visits from traveling musicians. It is essential that we act now to assure that this free exchance of music will continue. Comments should be addressed to : Loretta J. Shogren, Director Policy Directives and Instructions Immigration and Naturalization Service 425 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20536 --- Please let people know about this! -Peter Lee Fuligin%Umass.Bitnet@WISCVM.WISC.EDU