Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1986-10 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: nessus (Doug Alan)
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 86 12:00:10 EDT
Subject: S'more reviews of Our Kate
I subscribe to Matter and the latest issue (June 86) just came in the mail.... Tusco Vee of the Meatmen likes Danielle Dax. Everybody loves The Butthole Surfers. Matter is the last place in the world I would expect to find a review of *Hounds of Love*, but here one is 9 months after the album was released: If Kate Bush fronted an anonymous band on 4AD (the label whose over-the-top production techniques she seems to be emulating of late) [...] I think this guy is putting the chicken before the egg.... [...] and put out records sporting jackets that look like baggies full of wet tar instead of big pictures of her own face, maybe more chronic hipsters'd be willing to acknowledge the slightly skewed genius she very apparently possesses. M'self, I've always been glad she's just Kate Bush, an auteurist who doesn't wear her heart or her quasi-mystical pretentions on her sleeve -- hell, no, she's fashioned an entire *wardrobe* from the stuff. She's a singer/songwriter so idiosyncratic, so desperately unhip herself that you can't compare her to anyone else you'd even read about in this mag... couldn't even call her "new wave" -- not even as an *insult*. Course considerations like pretention and hipness are as out of place in talking about Kate Bush as Kate Bush is when your talking about trends in pop music. Anyways, sounds to me like *Hounds* is her best yet, songwriting on par with *The Kick Inside* and *Lionheart* (her first couple) while the singing ain't so theatrical, and the everything-and-the-kitchen-sink-with-the-diposal-unit-intact production of the proceeding rec, *The Dreaming*, is handled here a lot more effectively [...] Foo! [...] though, it's still a tad overbaked (use of taped voices esp. being a periodic nuisance). Small huff, really -- the only thing better than this record'd be a twelve-page photo spread of its mommy in *New Look*. Kidding, kidding. -- Chet Howland. And now for another little look at Kate Bush in the British press.... Curiously enough, that bozo Richard Cook, who wrote the wretched cover article on Kate Bush in Sounds, also wrote this review of "The Big Sky" for Sounds a short while back, which was the Single of the Week: A curious choice, and perhaps the winner by default. In this big pile of records, the few good shots are content to pick over small pleasures and little details. This is the only giant record here, the only one to overreach and maintain honour. The rehabilitation of Bush is a bit much: she is still the sort of girl who pours all her books and beads into the pot and stirs it up until you come out with an opera. Most of her records smell of tarot cards, kitchen curtains, and lavender pillows to me. But bits of *Hounds of Love* make something mischievous or even demonic come out of he throat, and 'The Big Sky' is a moment of real mad bravado. It starts like it's going to be one of the digital warrior dances Bush puts together when she wants to be uptempo and then a whole planet seems to be swirling around her voice. The best and most threatening thing that this bizarre talent has ever done. This is a review of "The Big Sky" by Stud Brothers for Melody Maker: Kate Bush, like some lithe Russian gymnast who makes even the most difficult exercise appear easy, gracefully treads the uneasy tightrope of progression and integrity without ever falling into indulgence and elitism. She has in fact, with her every release, managed to maintain a uniqueness without ever losing her public, something Siouxsie was almost praised for. But unlike The Banshees, she always sounds like herself and never sounds the same, and that's a difficult task. "The Big Sky" sounds like Kate Bush, but more importantly, like Hipsway and The Young Gods, it sounds like 1986. Truly gymnastic. "Love will get you like a case of anthrax And that's one thing I don't want to catch" Doug