Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1985-04 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Doug Alan <nessus>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 85 13:26:45 edt
Subject: Re: KB, SV, King Crimson, Joni, Joan Armatrading ...
> From: hound!hejira >> [Me:] In German: "Deep. Deep. Somewhere in the darkness, give her >> your light." > Dankeshoen! I'm impressed; I caught the "gib" and the "Licht", but > nothing else. I don't deserve the credit. It was deciphered by a friend of mine, who's taking German, and it took him about a week. I didn't even know it was German, until he told me. It sounded to me like "Deefa. Deefa. Urgen voida deefa. Keep this unleashed." I want the German version of RUTH!!! I know it exists, cuz someone I know heard it while in Germany.... but no one can find it anywhere. > You might give it (hejira) another try. Actually, I shouldn't comment on "Hejira", cuz I haven't heard it. But "Wild Things Run Fast" and "Court And Spark" didn't do much for me, though they are certainly good. >> [Me:] Well SV is quite less challenging musically [than KB]. > True, but her lyrics are *wonderful* -- and are more accessible to a > larger audience than those of KB. I agree. Suzanne Vega's music is wonderful too. Just not as challenging, but everyone's ears can use a rest ever now and then, right? I'm not convinced that Vega's lyrics are any less cryptic, though. (And they're not as good, but still excellent!) >> Why does she *loathe* KB? Too pop? Not pop enough? Too >> progressive? Not progressive enough? Well? > She found it "too pop". Then again, her first exposure to KB was side > 1 of HoL. I told her to give it another chance, but she seems > resigned to the notion that it's loathsome. What does she think of Peter Gabriel? KB is certainly no more pop than PG. And thinking about it, I'd say that Suzanne Vega is considerably more pop than Kate. Though, the "pop" part of Kate is more modern pop.... Thinking about what "pop" means confuses me sometimes, because I usually think of "pop" and "accessible" as being kind of synonomous. Though something that's accessible might be in an old style, and thus no longer pop. But then there are people like XTC, who do what sounds like innaccessible pop, which almost seems like a contradition -- but that's what it sounds like. In any case, that's what the first three songs on "Hounds of Love" sound like to me -- innaccessible pop. While Suzanne Vega is more like accessible avant-garde folk pop. It seems to me that any accessible pop should be considered more pop than inaccessible pop. In any case, if you want to cure this friend of thinking that Kate Bush is too pop, give her a tape of "The Dreaming". Is it possible that anyone could think that "The Dreaming" is too pop? I think not.... unless perhaps they listen to nothing but The Residents. If she already has her mind made up, you could not tell her it's Kate Bush and label the tape "Cathy Shrub" or something.... She'd probably think of a different excuse not to like it though, since people who make up their mind determinedly on a superficial listening are like that.... > Hey, no one took up my cue. Any Joan Armatrading fans around? I know there's at least one other out there! Don't be afraid of speaking up. > I picked up "The Key" the other night and noticed, for the first time, > that several members of King Crimson (great group!) were backup > musicians, as well as Stewart Copeland. That's pretty impressive! There's also a Roche's album that has King Crimson minus Adrian Belew backing. "The more I look at it, the more I like it I do think it's good" Doug