Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1996-36 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: "J. Dunnam" <jdunnam@winternet.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 19:47:22 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: RE: Kate and Wuthering Heights
To: love-hounds@gryphon.com
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Posted-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 19:47:22 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: owner-love-hounds
Hello, Love-Hounds! All this impassioned debate about whether Kate left a mistake in the newer version of "Wuthering Heights" has led me to wonder if there somehow mightn't be two different versions of the re-make. People keep saying that her voice cracks or that the note is flat, but I just don't hear it - and I'm not without some knowledge of music. In fact, it has crossed my mind before that the same point in the original version might be a tad less than perfect (but not too much). Yes, I know it's sacrilege; but, as has been pointed out, that word "Ca-thy" as sung in the original version *is* different from all the other recordings. The question of interest for me is why did Kate choose to redo the vocals on WH? Peace, Jennifer