Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1996-05 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Robb McCaffree <nsrjm@nursepo.medctr.ucla.edu>
Date: 25 Jan 1996 09:11:34 GMT
Subject: Re: Love-Hounds digest V12 #22
To: rec-music-gaffa@ucsd.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: University of California, Los Angeles
References: <9601250041.AA20968@fly.HiWAAY.net>
Sender: owner-love-hounds@gryphon.com
cbullard@HiWAAY.net (Len Bullard) wrote: > > Not having read those, I don't know if this was debated, > but sometimes a bit of grammatical fudging is done > to get the notes to sound correctly. The rule of thumb > is, vowels carry sound, consonants chop air. So a morph > combination like "..se mo.." comes out as "smoo" unless > an extra rest beat is stuck in and that kills the phrasing. > We don't pay much attention to these things in speaking, > but in singing and particularly in recording where the > performance is listened to and analyzed *to death*, > a singer often chooses phrasing over grammar. Is this why it sounds as if one of those cheery blue Smurfs is "playing his guitar refrain" in the middle of "MoP"? :-) Robb