Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1996-03 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Ulrich Grepel <uli@zoodle.robin.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 96 00:26:42 +0100
Subject: Re: FAQ: rec.music.gaffa - Love-Hounds - Kate Bush
To: love-hounds@uunet.uu.net
Content-Type: text/plain
References: <4dgls8$9n4@studium.student.umu.se><m0tcJg1-000G2AC@zoodle.robin.de> <4dm6gs$e34@studium.student.umu.se>
Sender: owner-love-hounds@gryphon.com
Hi! Magnus wrote that I wrote: [home address of Kate] > >Nevertheless *I* don't have it, and it's not common knowledge on love-hounds. > >And it's good so. For if you want to write a letter to her, you can send it > >to the KBC. > > Well, perhaps it's a bad idea to include the actual *postal* address in the FAQ, > but > why not outline in more general terms where she actually resides, kind of in the > same fashion as the house in Reading, Berkshire is mentioned. Well, that's still a fact that *I* don't know. Other than 'Kent'. > >Otherwise, the generic mass (of which I'm just one of many members) > >should leave her private life alone. > > Are you saying that Kate's private life isn't a proper subject for discussion and > information sharing on rec.music.gaffa? Well, this has to be divided into two parts: - approaching her in her private life (which is what you'd need the address for) - discussing (...) about what she does in her private life (wherefore you won't need the address) The first one is what I meant, and again, here we shouldn't try to get on her nerves. The second one is what you ask for. And *I* don't care too much (except that she should make more albums of course) about that one too. But I accept and understand that others do care and want to discuss it, so I won't try to stop anyone from doing so. But don't expect me to participate too much in these discussions. Just to say it even more explicitly: This is not a flame. Bye, Uli -- "Ein 32-Bit-Betriebssystem fuer uns?" - "Wozu? Wir haben doch zwei mit 16." [IBM ad promoting OS/2] "Bah, ich habe 4 mit 8!" [comment from Sven Wachter]