Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1995-30 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: kln@a.crl.com
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 14:23:47 -0700
Subject: Artistic Categories
To: love-hounds@uunet.uu.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
I certainly wouldn't nail ANYONE to any kind of cross. Nasty affairs, those crucifictions. I hope I was gently making a point . . . pardon me if not. Regarding whether or not other artistic endeavors by Kate would be good, well, we'd have to see them first. I am not willing to accept a priori that working in one medium automatically precludes the possibility that one could be talented in another medium. I think this concept is fostered by the university system and by our society for convenience. But, like many other concepts fostered by universities and social systems, I don't think it is necessarily true. The classification of artists into strict, non- permeable categories may soon die out. With the ability to create a story, corresponding visual imagery, music to support the theme, and the ability to draw a viewer into active participation, I predict that we'll see people doing wildly exciting cross-media projects. Who can resist? The challenge is just too damned interesting. The medium is too fun to work in. Now if they could just make digital paint SMELL like oil paint we'd be getting somewhere! I hope to see in the near future the evolution of an experiential artform composed of the marriage of current art media, and a few not even thought of yet. I also hope to see Kate dive in with the gusto she's shown in filmmaking. Specialization, in the immortal words of Mr. Heinlein, is for insects. Karen kln@a.crl.com Multi-room house, eh? OK Vickie, fess up, what have you heard?