Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1995-14 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: JForward@tais.telecom.com.au (Jonathan Forward)
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1995 17:29:54 +0000
Subject: Re: Kate: Au Naturale ? URL
To: love-hounds@uunet.UU.NET
Cc: JForward@SITGBSD1.telecom.com.au
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
In article <QQymhn20005.199504201653@relay2.UU.NET> MRGHEESL@TWSUVM.UC.TWSU.EDU writes: >Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 12:54:01 -0400 >From: MRGHEESL@TWSUVM.UC.TWSU.EDU >Subject: Kate: Au Naturale ? URL >Since my posting of a mention of a POSSIBLE (NOT PROVEN) nude photo of >our own beloved Kate, I've been receiving about ten times more mail >than I usually do. Some of this mail has confirmed or denied the >possibility -- one claims to have met the photographer or the >photographer's assistant. >While I doubt no one's veracity, the PROOF has yet to be seen. >Anyway, many of you have also requested the URL> Since I was surfing >the net with a graphical browser (Netscape), I have no idea what the >URL is -- I didn't look. However, go into "Search" mode and look for >the "Purient Page." That page will link you to various adult areas >including the infamous photo I was speaking about. >The location of the photo matters little. What I want is confirmation >or denial that Kate posed nude. Got any proof out there ? Let's see it >posted. >Happy Hunting >Roman Flatland USA (Wichita, KS) Perilously close to Oklahoma City Not nearly close enough IMHO. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 'Nothing that actually occurs is of the smallest importance' - Oscar Wilde ------------------------------------------------------------------------------