Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1995-07 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: "Brian J Dillard" <dillardb@student.msu.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 1995 12:15:56 -0500 (EST)
Subject: kate's pension
To: love-hounds@uunet.uu.net (lovehounds)
Content-Length: 1610
Content-Type: text
in the new Q magazine (April 95) there is an article called "Ker-Ching" that looks at how much rock stars make, etc. Under the sub-heading: "Kate Bush's Pension Plan": "Pensions are a serios business for pop stars. They get lots of money when they're young and not so much probably when they're old, unless they've put a lot of their income into pensions. Pensions also happen to be a good way of saving tax and preserving wealth for the future at the same time. Kate Bush makes huge pension contributions. In 1992, for example, she paid herself &130,000 in fees but her total pension contributions were &223,000. In 1989 she'd put &476,000 into the pension fund.But last year she stopped. She'd probably over-funded it. There's only so much you can put into a pension fund. The money she's put in will have saved her a third in tax, so rather than pay away that money, given the fact that she doesn't need it, she'd say, OK, I'll put it into the pension. She could retire at 50, or 45, and by that time she'd have a few million pounds in the fund, so that'll do nicely for the rest of her life. She wouldn't have to perform again--not that she does anyway, haha!" all quotes courtesy of the guy who wrote the book that the article draws from. It goes on a bit and lists Kate's pension payments 1985-1992, which total close to a million and a half pounds as of 1992. . . . yeesh! i think this sheds some light on an earlier thread, months old now, about kate vs. tori and record sales and blah blah blah . . . . the old gel is doing ok for herself. . . . . not madonna, but who'd want to be?! brian dillard