Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-22 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: pptjc@brighton.ac.uk (Peter Chow <pptjc@uk.ac.bton.vaxk>)
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 1994 02:01:59 GMT
Subject: Re: "You Want Alchemy"
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: University of Brighton, Brighton, England
References: <1994Jul20.141813.5242@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <1994Jul26.021148.17095@unix.brighton.ac.uk>, <1994Jul26.134931.12778@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
Reply-To: pptjc@brighton.ac.uk
Sender: news@unix.bton.ac.uk
In article <1994Jul26.134931.12778@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>, as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Tree of Schnopia) writes: >In <1994Jul26.021148.17095@unix.brighton.ac.uk> pptjc@brighton.ac.uk (Peter Chow <pptjc@uk.ac.bton.vaxk>) writes: > >>I happen to like YWA quite a lot but I'm not going to fly off the deep end >>because someone opines that it is "crap". Without a qualifying argument >>to support such a statement it carries little weight. Whenever I talk to >>someone about music or a film or whatever it is not so much whether they liked >> it or not that matters to me but *why* they liked or disliked it. If you >>cannot quantify what elements of a piece of art you are criticising then >>your judgement, one way or the other, counts for little. > >Well, actually, if I had meant to offer a "judgement" I would have >quantified it. As it was, I was offering an opinion. > >I *would* quantify my opinion and offer a judgement, but I don't have the >single here in Rochester with me. If you'd like to know what bothers me >I'll bring it back with me this weekend and listen to it some more. > >Drew > Peter Chow from Brighton (UK) continues: I look forward to hearing your _considered_ opinions. :-)