Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-13 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: pptjc@vaxk.bton.ac.uk (It's in the trees... It's coming...)
Date: Tue, 3 May 1994 14:57:20 GMT
Subject: Transcription
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: University of Brighton, Brighton, England
Reply-To: pptjc@vaxk.bton.ac.uk
Sender: news@unix.bton.ac.uk
Peter Chow from Brighton (UK) writes: Someone posted about the lyrics to 'You Want Alchemy'. I have a copy that I transcribed a few weeks ago... What a lovely afternoon On a cloudbusting kind of day. We took our own 'Mystery Tour' And got completely lost somewhere up in the hills. And we came up on a bee-keeper, And he said "Did you know they can change it all?" You want alchemy. They turn the roses into gold They turn the lilac into honey They're making love for the peaches. And we're thinking, "Who is this guy?" "Is he some kind of nut or what?". He said, "I don't meet many people..", "I'm very busy with the hives.". ZzzzZzzzz.. Sun's gone down.. "When's my cloud of bees coming home?". They got alchemy. They turn the roses into gold They turn the lilac into honey They're making love for the peaches. And they'll do it, Do it for you. They'll do it, Do it for you. "And if you see them, send 'em right on home to me" (what they gonna do...?) They got Aaaaaaaa.. Turn the roses into gold. And they'll do it for you Do it for you (what they gonna do...?) I'll tell Yaaaaaa... Making love for the peaches. (what they gonna do...?) Daaaaaamaaaaakiiiiindaaaaa honey. (they do it for you) They do it for you. And why not...? They bring me so much pleasure. I have to say that my favourite lines are the last but one and the one that goes "Is he some kind of nut - or what?". That such a sarcastic remark should be sung so sweetly is really very funny. I listen to it quite a lot (unlike 'Show A Little Devotion') but even though I really like the song, there are some serious defects that detract from my enjoyment. The drum sound is truely appalling; very agressive due to a combination of harsh EQ and all the cymbals being far too high in the mix. There's also an unforgivably crud edit at 3:08.5 on the word "You". The track as a whole displays some mild digital clipping and the cello sustain at the end has an annoying dropout on it. This could mean that the strings were recorded at another studio on analogue machines (like the orchestra for MoP) or were recorded at Kate's place a couple of years ago before the switch to digital. Y'know, it's at times like this that I feel like writing to Kate and giving her and especially Del a damn good telling off!!! I mean... would *you* spend 100 grand on digital multi-track and mastering recorders just to show off your latest failures at engineering? The argument that 'oh well, it's just a B-side...' doesn't work (not least because the album has got some duff engineering on it too). If you're going to do something, do it properly! This has always been true but is more so now that digital technology makes your mistakes *that* much more obvious. Perhaps one of the reasons people resist digital audio is that analogue audio recordings hide a multitude of sins... Please don't all kill me at once; form a nice orderly queue! :)