Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-12 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: pptjc@vaxk.bton.ac.uk (It's in the trees... It's coming...)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 1994 13:16:54 GMT
Subject: Re: (diffs) FAQ: rec.music.gaffa - Love-Hounds - Kate Bush
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: University of Brighton, Brighton, England
References: <m0pvB4D-000AF8C@zoodle.robin.de> <m0pvIwP-000il7C@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu> <2pfo1d$ol7@Mercury.mcs.com>, <20644.9404260353@daiches.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Reply-To: pptjc@vaxk.bton.ac.uk
Sender: news@unix.bton.ac.uk
In article <20644.9404260353@daiches.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, rjc@cogsci.edinburgh.ac.uk writes: > >[Jorn & Chris off again]. > >Sigh, here we go again. > >Ahooora! Ahoooora! Ahoooora! Ego war alert. Abandon Newsgroup. Begin >emergency LH flame war stimulation measures. > > Happy Rhodes, Tori Amos, Bjork, Laurie Anderson. > Happy Rhodes, Tori Amos, Bjork, Laurie Anderson. > Happy Rhodes, Tori Amos, Bjork, Laurie Anderson. > > Where is Gaffa? > > What does `get Out of My House' mean? > > Does KaTe feed her cats fish? Isn't that evil? > >-- >rjc@cogsci.ed.ac.uk _O_ > |< >>Peter Chow from Brighton (UK) adds: >> Yes, quite... I've only just joined the newsgroup and the one thing that >> appealed to me about the idea of it was that text communication should >> mean an end to discrimination on physical attributes because over a >> terminal you have none. But looking at the goings on here I see that >> the Human Nature is ever resourceful and failing discrimination on >> physical attributes people will discriminate on intellectual and >> personality attributes. >> >> This kind of attack is far more serious than >> attacking the shape, size, colour, etc. of a person because those are >> just the things that make up 'what' you are but to attack someones >> personality is to attack that which defines 'WHO' you are. The injury >> caused is compounded by the fact that it IS text communication where >> the thoughts expressed carry more weight due to the fact that you >> have to write it rather than just blurt it out in speech which can be >> done very quickly and regretted instantly. Writing something says that >> you have considered it and MEAN it. >> >> The practice of 'flaming' is disgusting and on a mail system >> like the one at this University is something that would be enough to >> get you 'dis-usered' by the computer center. >> >> Peter Chow (pptjc@uk.ac.brighton.vms)