Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-12 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: pptjc@vaxk.bton.ac.uk (It's in the trees... It's coming...)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 1994 16:23:26 GMT
Subject: Re: Requesting info. about KaTe songs
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: University of Brighton, Brighton, England
References: <m0ptSSL-000BfFC@mercury.mcs.com>,<2pbber$6hi@atlas.cs.upei.ca>
Reply-To: pptjc@vaxk.bton.ac.uk
Sender: news@unix.bton.ac.uk
In article <2pbber$6hi@atlas.cs.upei.ca>, fmcquarr@atlas.cs.upei.ca (Fiona McQuarrie) writes: >If "Ran tan Waltz" is a folk tune, then why does Kate hold the copyright >on it and why is she listed as the author? > >Any why do you assume that "Babooshka" involves an "aging" wife? Seems >to me it;s about a husband who's lost interest in his wife, age not >being an issue at all, > >Cheers, Fiona >> Peter Chow from Brighton (UK) adds: >> I don't know about Ran Tan Waltz specifically but in other cases it >> is possible for the music to be a traditional tune with no lyrics so >> the author of the lyrics is alowed to say so and the copyright is on >> the recording, not the song (as with classical recordings of long- >> dead composers.). >> I recon that's plausible but don't chew me out if you know better!