Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1993-04 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik)
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 18:50:17 GMT
Subject: Re: Sound quality / Peter Gabriel's "Us"
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
References: <fester.723754426@parnasus> <3858@iris.mincom.oz.au>
Sender: news@galileo.cc.rochester.edu
In <3858@iris.mincom.oz.au> cjm@iris.mincom.oz.au (Chris Moran) writes: >George Ludwig (fester@parnasus.dell.com) wrote: >: While I'm still not sure about my position on TSW, I must agree that >: my first reaction on listening to US was that the sound quality was >: very muffled. There's like no high end to be found on the record. I'm >: not sure what "novel technique" you're referring to, but I recall >: reading on the liner notes that many of the rythm tracks were >: originally recorded on location in the early 80's. God only knows what >: Peter was using for a deck...nagra? 14-bit Casio DAT? Walkman >: Professional? But I suspect that he used a lot of these ryhtms >: (recorded under less-than-ideal circumstances) and didn't want to make >: them stand out for their lack of quality. Thus, (and this is merely a >: theory) the "subdued" mix of most of the other tracks. > The lack of high-end I believe is deliberate, and not a result of poor >recording. The mood of the album is dark and cathartic, not joyous, and a >rolled-off high-end helps establish this. >Chris Moran >chris.moran@mincom.oz.au And for what it's worth, I was quite pleased with "Us" and consider its material a definite step up from "So". I mean, I love most of the tracks on "So," but you can't imagine how sick I am of "Sledgehammer" and "Big Time". UGH! I listened to this CD last night and have no complaints about the sound quality whatsoever; I think it's very appropriate and very effective. Drewcifer P.S. The only thing I really *disliked* about "Us" (besides Fourteen Black Paintings) was the substitution of duet partners: Sinead O'Connor instead of Kate Bush. Step down, or *what*? :) -- *************************************************************************** ** Andrew David Simchik, registered Scorpio ************* SCHNOPIA! ******* *************************************************************************** as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu