Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1993-01 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: eric.walker@channel1.com (Eric Walker)
Date: 16 Nov 92 (10:25)
Subject: kate and sick ideas
To: love-hounds@uunet.UU.NET
UG> Regarding the increasing bizzare views on justifiable "theft" UG>that have been given here, I only wish to stress (again) that there is UG>NO evidence (that I know of) that Kate endorses theft, whether UG>"politically" justified or not. Nor is there any evidence that Kate UG>herself was a thief when young. Of course people are free to give There are many cases of musicians playing certain "characters" in their songs that have little or no relation to their personalities in real life. For example, Peter Gabriel has a disturbing, haunting song called "Family Snapshot," which tells a story in the first-person tense of a political assassin, who waits with his gun for a famous person to appear so that he can kill him. He does this, he says, to get some attention and to "be somebody." Does Gabriel endorse the assassination of political figures because of this song? Certainly not! It's the same way with Kate and "There Goes A Tenner." Just because the character in the song is a thief doesn't mean that Kate is/was a thief. Likewise, if Arnold Schwarzenegger plays a killing robot in "The Terminator," does that mean he kills people in real life? If I remember right, it was the failure of certain narrow-minded people to recognize the difference between "characters" on a record album and people in real life that led to at least one instance of a rock-and-roll star being sued, and a campaign formed against his album. I think it was Ozzy Osbourne's infamous "Suicide Solution," but I'm not sure. (I'm not an Ozzy fan.) --- ~ SLMR 2.1a ~ ...all for a children's crusade... -- Channel 1 (R) Cambridge, MA