Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1992-34 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: "K.R.Marshall" <pcxkrm@unicorn.nott.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 92 18:14:10 GMT
Subject: Re: (no subject given!)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Cripps Computing Centre, University of Nottingham
References: <9212011842.aa14528@hobbes.sco.com> <1992Dec1.235649.20610@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <1992Dec2.024753.20916@ultra.com>
Sender: news@cs.nott.ac.uk
In article <1992Dec2.024753.20916@ultra.com> ultra!corin!keving@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Kevin W. Gurney) writes: > >1. Do radio stations in the UK broadcast in stereo? > >2. For those of you who have been over the pond, does American FM radio > sound better to you than the BBC, et al? By "better", I mean specifically > having a richer sound with a wider frequency range (in a song, not more > frequencies on which to broadcast.) > >3. If the answer to #1 is "no", and #2 is "yes", does anyone think Kate > could have tailor produced the sound of TSW for British radio, in much the > same way that some film-makers will purposely compose shots for a > television set's aspect ratio, which is smaller than that of the bigger > screen? Seems pretty far-fetched, but it's better than suggesting that > Kate's going deaf in the high frequencies. Answers: 1. Radio stations in the UK definitely do broadcast in stereo. 2. Having just come back from 3 weeks in the States I can't say that I noticed any difference in radio quality at all - except the difficulty of tuning in to one particular radio station in the US as there are so many of them! 3. - answers itself! - however, theoretically I suppose it is possible - I think that some companies mix CD's differently from LP's etc to take advantage of the different frequency ranges available. Keith. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Mummy was an asteroid, Daddy was | Keith Marshall a small, non-stick kitchen utensil..." | pcxkrm@unicorn.nott.ac.uk