Gaffaweb > Love & Anger > 1992-29 > [ Date Index | Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]


Re: RUTH Flamers

From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik)
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 16:59:16 GMT
Subject: Re: RUTH Flamers
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
Sender: news@galileo.cc.rochester.edu

	Recently I posted an article clarifying the lyrics of "Running Up
That Hill" for someone who had misheard them. I also provided a sort of very
broad interpretation that encapsulated my view of the song.
	I don't recall the exact wording of my article, but I hope I made it
clear that sexual pleasure was only one facet of the song's meaning.  And,
in fact, I do believe most of the imagery ("running up that hill," even)
implies a sexual or at least sensual interpretation.  There are many ways of
approaching the lyrics, some platonic, some romantic...the point is, you and
I may have totally different views about the song and I hope you didn't
totally underestimate my cognizance of that fact.
	My idea of the song is not an esoteric view.  And, I might add that
I ordinarily detest sexual/Freudian interpretation, but in this case I feel
it's quite justified.
	But think what you like; true intellectuals do anyway.

	--Andrew D. Simchik
	The U of R is not me; my views are not a part of it.