Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1992-23 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: acsbk@UMASSD.EDU
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 14:00:40 GMT
Subject: Out in the garden their's HALF of a heaven (re:UTAH SAINTS)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: UMASS DARTMOUTH, NO. DARTMOUTH, MA.
Reply-To: acsbk@UMASSD.EDU
Sender: news@cis.umassd.edu (USENET News System)
For simplicity, I will use the following definitions from Websters: Music: n. def 1. The art and science of combining vocal or instrumental sounds or tones in varying melody, harmony, rhythm, and timbre, esp. so as to form structurally complete and emotionally expressive compositions. Music: n. def 3. any rhythmic sequence of pleasing sounds, as of birds, water, etc. Song: n. 1. the act or art of singing 2. a piece of music sung or as if for singing. Does the Utah Saints song 'kick'? Is it danceable? Industrial? Yes, it is danceable, it is a 'kicking' tune. Industrial? opinions vary, but I for one think that it is industrial in that it was probably cranked out in a Electronic Music studio (speaking from experience) in a matter of several hours. Is it music? Is it a 'song'. Is it Ethical? It can be plainly seen from the definitions that it is NOT a song, for the U.S. performer does not sing, the person shouts. Samples of singing dod not count. In critique I can offer however, that the phase envelope in the begining of the Kate sample is sweet, though the backrythm can be worked much better than the way it was overdubbed, and the instruments should be brought forward a few tracks and out of the murk. Music and ethics: (this is not flaming, beleive it or not.) It is music only in the same sense as definition 3. It is neither structuraly complete nor emotionally expressive. When I say not complete in structure, I mean not that it lacks in entirety, I am saying that it is only 80% there. When I say no emotions, I mean nothing of worth. It excites people, like it is supposed to, and may express anxiety and agression, but not through its 'lyrics'. Ethics. ouch. From a musician's standpoint: Kate's sample is 7 sylables longer than the U.Saints vocal track. There is more integrity and merrit in my banging two rocks together than in the whole of the U.S. piece. Why? because I bang them together MYSELF. I invite discussion on this matter seeing as it does have to do intrinsically with Kate, not with ethics of the above, but alternative or opposing critique of the piece itself. If you wish to flame, lay on, for my address is below and you dont need to waste bandwidth. Bret Kulakovich, ACSBK@UMASSD.EDU. My appologies for the spelling/structure errors, this editor is newly installed and does catywonker things. 'You know that something good is gonna happen' (c) 1985? Kate Bush Music Ltd. EMI.