Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1992-18 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: rhill@netrun.cts.com (ronald hill)
Date: Thu, 28 May 1992 05:41:06 -0700
Subject: **** EMI NEVER FOR EVER INTERVIEW 2A *******
To: Love-Hounds@wiretap.Spies.COM
Organization: NetRunner's Paradise BBS, San Diego CA
Oops sorry about that blank message. I tried to send this a couple of days ago and no luck so here it is again. I hope it doesn't got twice. I: Did the tour (1979) change the way you felt about what you wanted to do in live work in the future? K: Yes, it did. I think it helped me tremendously because I felt that it worked and if it hadn't then it would have again totally changed my idea of live work. It makes me want to go on further, makes me feel that the show was an incredibly important starting point and yet it was quite embryonic in so many ways and there is so much more to do. The thing that worries me is when to do the live work, because of things like money and time that's taken up rehearsing as well as actually doing the tour. I: Isn't it true that almost no matter what you charge, you're not going to make money? K: Well, I think probably if you do play in huge halls you can do it, but we didn't on the last tour, there was no way, mainly because of all the sets we had and huge crew to move the sets and theatrical props and things. I don't think we ever could make money on the tours that we do. But in so many ways that not important - as long as you can just break even that's fine. I don't really expect to make money because I make so much more out of doing it - I get so much more for myself than money. I: You would never want to do a concert just singing with a microphone? K: Well, I've thought about it a lot and I think it is the ultimate way in so many ways to perform, because it's so simple and simplicity is what everything should be. But I do feel that I've got more to do in this area before I can then revert back to being just simple. It seems that nobody is really trying this area and I wanted to - especially connecting dance, theatre and music together. Because they are so compatible and Wagner did it very well a few years ago, so I would like to keep trying. I: Are you still practising in dance? K: No, I haven't, I've let it slip for a while. I think the album was the main reason for that. I tried to do some classes before we started in the afternoon and after about a week I was just so exhausted that my energies weren't going on either the dancing or the music properly. I: "All We Ever Look For" is the fourth track on side 1 and it mentions your father, mother, brothers. Did your family actually inspire this song? K: Yes, they did. Families as a whole did and because I am a member of a close family they were obviously in my mind a lot. It's interesting the things that we do pick up from our parent - the way we look or little scratching habits or something and obviously the genetic thing must be in there. All the time it's going round in a big circle - we are always looking for something, all of us, just people generally and so often we never get it. We're looking for happiness, we're looking for a little bit of truth from our children, we're looking for God, and so seldom do we find it because we don't really know how to look. I: And that's what the song is about - as you say, all we ever look for Another Womb; All we ever look for - a god, a drug, a great big hug, all these things. It's amazing really that your family has managed to remain so close considering that your success must have thrown a spanner into the works in some way, at least upset the apple cart of ordinbut if you get a proper sound when the instrument is actually being put down on to tape then there's not much need to change it. That's the point when the main concentration went on - when the actual musician was playing his part, playing his overdub, we would be very strict, and I think they worked incredibly hard because I did push them hard at times. What they did was so beautiful, so perfect, their sounds, so right. I: The next track is called "Violin" (they had already discussed "The Wedding List" and to me it has a lot of new wave feel. Does that seem an accurate thing to say? K: Yes, we wanted to make it very bizarre and very very up and the idea was the mad fiddler, not so much the violinist in the orchestra but the mad fiddler like Paganini or Nero watching the city burn. It was meant to be very fun, nothing deep and serious, nothing really meaningful, just a play on the fiddle, the things it represents, its madness. I: You have another musician, Kevin Bird, playing the violin - have you yourself ever played that instrument? K: Well, I did when I was a child, yes, I learnt it for a few years but while I was learning it I discovered the piano, I couldn't really relate to it in the same way. Kevin is a fantastic fiddler, he used to be in the Bothy Band, I think he probably still is, and he's just wonderful - he's so Irish and so full of the music and he was so perfect for the song. I: It's almost ironic that it does have a very up tempo new waveish feel because in some of your earliest interviews you said that some of your favourite artists were the new wave artists even though you yourself did not transmit as a new wave artist. Do you think there's any paradox in that? K: Hard to say. I suppose I can't really relate to them, that's what I mean, because I do feel different in so many ways, like the way I go about things. I'm not projecting myself as a new wave person and people wouldn't accept me as such because my music is generally not in that area. But I love the energy, I love the power and the rawness - I love raw music, it's very primitive, it's what so much of our music is about. That's what I love and it's something I've always enjoyed - I've always loved rock 'n' roll and only recently have I started learning to control rhythm in my songs. It's normally controlled me and it's mainly the rhythm box that has helped me tremendously. I: Your songs all have different identity, very specific mood, based in part on the subject matter and one can't help but wonder in what circumstances the ideas come to you. Let's just take one, the next one - "The Infant Kiss". Where and how did that idea come to you? K: That's from a very old British movie, I think it's a Fifties movie that was called The Innocents and it was based on a book called The Turn of the Screw. I haven't seen the film for I suppose eight years now but they showed it twice I think when I was much younger and it's a very very haunting film and the fact that it's in black and white makes it even spookier, it's very eerie. The story is that a governess goes to look after two children, a young boy and a young girl who are in fact possessed by the spirits of the previous gardener and the maid - and she doesn't know this, as far as she's concerned they're just two children. She starts noticing that when she tucks the little boy in bed that instead of giving her a little peck on the cheek he give her a very big manly passionate kiss. And in the film they really didn't go into that area very strongly, it was much more the haunting, but it always fascinated me that strange distortion of the child having a very experienced hard man inside. Something that the child could never be without the experience that a much older man would have. It seemed very disturbing and in order to make it very intimate and to make people try to understand how terrible it is for her, it's sung in the first person and it's really confusing for her, she's really terrified by what's happening. I: I do find this such a beautiful lyric: Word of caress on their lips that speak of adult love, I want to smack by I hold back; I only want to touch. You really do create this picture of a woman who wants to respond as a woman rather than as a governess or a mother. Does the distortion of relationships in general other than just this particular one, appeal to you as a subject? K: Yes, terribly. I think it is that distortion that makes me want to write about it and there seems to be distortion in so many areas and that's what's so fascinating, because without that distortion things would probably be so simple, so easy and it's always that little thing that makes it hard for us. I: There follows an interlude called "Night Scented Stock". Have you ever wanted to do more in the way of instrumental or sound without words? K: Yes, I have. I think perhaps I've always felt worried about doing it myself because I've always written songs and I've never really regarded myself as much as a musician as a songwriter. This album taught me that I should be a little more brave about that because music without words is just as beautiful and sometimes I feel the need to just keep putting words on music instead of just letting the music be. I hope in the future that perhaps I will move into that area a little more. --- rhill@netrun.cts.com (ronald hill) NetRunner's Paradise BBS, San Diego CA