Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-19 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: larry@csccat.cs.com (Larry Spence)
Date: 5 Jun 91 19:32:46 GMT
Subject: Re: ha! got another one!
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Computer Support Corporation. Dallas,Texas
References: <9106020801.AA14581@EDDIE.MIT.EDU> <1991Jun3.162934.16156@cbnews.cb.att.com>
Reply-To: csccat!larry@uunet.UU.NET (Larry Spence)
In article <1991Jun3.162934.16156@cbnews.cb.att.com> nrc@cbema.att.COM (Neal R Caldwell, Ii) writes: >From article <9106020801.AA14581@EDDIE.MIT.EDU>, by jburka@silver.ucs.indiana.EDU: >> >> "I gotta play some of this woman's music for you..." >> >> "Who is she?" >> >> "I told you already, she's this great singer/songwriter from Albany, NY. >> If you like KaTe as much as you say you do, you'll like it." > >Sorry, but this really irks me. Why not just rephrase it into "If you don't >like this you don't like KaTe as much as you say you do."? I doubt >that Jeff really meant it that way but I've noticed a trend toward a >certain "Musical Correctness" in this group that I find distressing. I don't think that this is a particularly new or startling trend here. I guess it's inevitable that in a newsgroup dedicated to Kate that the value of artists would be proportional to their Kate-ishness. Rare exceptions to this have been a few mentions of Bill Nelson, David Sylvian, etc., by IED and others. Can someone clue me in as to whether I should order the Happy CD because it's Kate-ish or because (I hope) it's great in a _unique_ way? Let's face it, no one can out-Kate Kate (lately, not even Kate can do it %( ). >The last artist that was presented to me this way was Jane Siberry. I >tried it, it's nice, it doesn't particularly appeal to me. Jane >Siberry is obviously talented but to me it's absurd to put her in >in a class with Kate. I agree with that, for what it's worth. She's very talented, but seems to be standing directly in Kate's shadow. I like _The Walking_, but it didn't make me want to run out and buy her other albums. Too uneven. Just MHO... >But I reserve the right make my own decisions >on who's music I like or don't like and I refuse to have my love of >Kate's music called into question because of it. Fer sure. Do we really want to encourage a crop of second-generation Kates to flood the market? Just listen to Toyah screw up the new Fripp disc for a good example. N.B.: I'm not implying that Happy is one of these, I haven't heard her stuff yet. Could someone please give us a mini-review? If it's already been done, I'd appreciate a copy by email. Thanks. -- Larry Spence larry@csccat.cs.com ..{uunet,texsun,cs.utexas.edu,decwrl}!csccat!larry