Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1990-13 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: emx.utexas.edu!ut-emx!slh@cs.utexas.edu (Susan L. Cecelia Harwood)
Date: 12 Apr 90 15:09:04 GMT
Subject: Re: Jane Siberry & Kate (Dieties in my Book you betcha!)
Article-I.D.: ut-emx.28100
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: UTexas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Posted: Thu Apr 12 10:09:04 1990
Posted-Date: 12 Apr 90 15:09:04 GMT
References: <9004120835.AA01970@world.std.com>
Reply-To: emx.utexas.edu!emx!slh@cs.utexas.edu (Susan L. Cecelia Harwood)
In article <9004120835.AA01970@world.std.com> katefans@world.std.COM (Chris'n'Vickie of Kansas City) writes: [re: Kate Bush is God, she really is!] >My personal equation: > >If >(Kate=God) >Then >(Jane=Jesus) > >It's a fact! >ps: though sometimes I think of Kate more as The Holy Ghost! Now, now. Let's be fair. The advantage to a polytheism is that you don't have to go around deciding who goes where. Everyone is a face of the same great Lady (although some are more attractive faces than others). Lessee... Kate as Brigid? Or maybe Artemis. Actually, I guess it'd change with the songs themselves. Like the Morrigan for "Babooshka," Aphrodite for "The Sensual World," or Diana for "The Big Sky." Can't put one to Jane yet (okay, okay, Vickie, I get the idea! I'll go already! :-) ). Any road. Kate Bush is God *and* Goddess. She really is. -- --------Susan L. Cecelia Harwood----------------------------------------------- The whims that we're weeping for our parents would be beaten for. --Kate Bush -----------(slh@emx.utexas.edu)------------The University of Texas @Austin-----