Gaffaweb > Love & Anger > 1990-09 > [ Date Index | Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Rolling Stone reviews, Sinead, and Kate

From: bnrgate!bcrka201!cadnews@uunet.UU.NET (Automated junk mover)
Date: 2 Mar 90 22:14:21 GMT
Subject: Re: Rolling Stone reviews, Sinead, and Kate
Distribution: maintenance
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Old-Message-Id: <4LRFNGP@drivax.UUCP>
Organization: Digital Research, Inc., Monterey, California
Posted: Fri Mar 2 14:14:21 1990
References: <9002282240.AA26871@EDDIE.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: bnrgate!drivax!liberato@uunet.UU.NET (Jimmy Liberato)
Sender: bnrgate!bnr.ca!cadnews@uunet.UU.NET



eboneste@BBN.COM (Liz Bonesteel) writes:

>Speaking more of Rolling Stone, I heard a rumor they trashed HOL when
>it came out.  Can anyone confirm this?

Well the final line of a very short (400 line) mini-review was "...her
vision will seem silly the those who believe children should be seen 
and not heard."  The sad part of it was the reviewer offered no original 
insights and it was transparent that he gathered most of his information
from other reviews he had read.  

--
Jimmy Liberato   ...!amdahl!drivax!liberato