Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1989-15 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: microsoft!brianw@uunet.uu.net
Date: Fri Aug 11 15:30:54 1989
Path: microsoft!brianw
From: brianw@microsoft.UUCP (Brian Willoughby)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: Kate's cat food and record label
Date: 11 Aug 89 22:30:52 GMT
References: <762@argon.UUCP>
Reply-To: brianw@microsoft.UUCP (Brian Willoughby)
Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA
Lines: 44
In article <762@argon.UUCP> Love-Hounds@GAFFA.MIT.EDU writes:
>Really-From: argon!ebh@rutgers.edu (Ed Horch)
>
>Why oh why oh why did she have to sign with the sleaziest quantity-
>before-quality record company in America??????? Did they offer her
>*that* good a deal? (Those of you who think that signing with CBS
>will necessarily mean better promotion of her music, remember how
>much good that did Wendy Carlos. She finally ended up signing with
>Larry Fast's Audion label.)
>
>-Ed
I agree! I happen to be listening to a tape of HoL as I type (I
don't have a turntable at work). I only played it once to tape it
and it already sounds like it has years of wear on it. I still
haven't switched to CD media yet because most of the artists I
listen to are on labels like Private Music which have near-Japanese
quality pressings. I'm waiting for DAT to settle down, so I don't
have to waste any money on over-priced Read Only CD's. Is it true
that there is legislation to prevent the sale of imported records?
Like the Japanese pressings I understand are on virgin vinyl?
It seems like job one of the record companies is to preserve their
profits, and the actual quality of albums (and many of the CDs I
have listened to as well) is like job null. They had rather
reduce the quality of all CDs legally purchased, than allow a
consumer to make a high quality (I hardly think an ANALOG copy of
a CD onto DAT is HIGH quality) copy of their poor merchandise.
I guess the want to prevent competition from overseas as well.
>
>The interested reader is directed to a discussion over in rec.food.veg
>regarding what vegetarians feed their pets. The general consensus is
>that it's ok to feed a dog a vegetarian diet, but not a cat. The
>cat family is carnivorous; all cats *must* have meat in their diets.
>
Cats will go blind due to the lack of a certain hormone if they do not
get meat (I forget the name)
Brian Willoughby
UUCP: ...!{tikal, sun, uunet, elwood}!microsoft!brianw
InterNet: microsoft!brianw@uunet.UU.NET
or: microsoft!brianw@Sun.COM
Bitnet brianw@microsoft.UUCP