Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1987-04 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: IED0DXM%UCLAMVS.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 87 13:52 PST
Subject: Misk.
KT NEWS: The CD of Never For Ever (a German pressing) is now in import stores in the L.A. area. Residents should hurry to Aron's, where they just got a LARGE number of The Dreaming and Never For Ever CDs in, but three were sold in the first five minutes or so. Mail bag: >Hey, IED, I'm STILL waiting for you to damn the Butthole Surfers as >un-Kate-like and therfore "bad." Wattsamattah? Can't RISE to the >challenge, boy? > > "Yeah" - Lennon > > James Hofmann Sorry, Hofmann got mistaken for Wicinski. (Is there any real difference)? Anyway, |>oug already "shredded" (to use the popular L-Hs term) your comparison. >From: drukman%UMASS.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu > (Jonathan S. Drukman) >Subject: Goddamn mailer trashed my message > >I had written a real pithy and incisive reply to another one of IED's >attempts to put Experiment IV among the gods, but it got lost somewhere >between Here and There. So, without the benefit of the original posting, >I will try to get my points across. > >IED accused :>oug and myself of being "weird" merely because we singled >out ONE track from "The Ninth Wave" as an example of a song superior >to Experiment IV... I would like to remind IED that Kate herself saw >fit to release "Jig Of Life" (the track mentioned) as the B-Side to a >12"... So maybe IED is the one who is weird (or maybe IED is irreproachable >and KATE is the one being weird here...) > >IED also rebutted my opinion of the violin intro as "weepy" by saying >something like "it is NOT weepy!" Well, I said it sounds weepy to me, >and unless IED is going to volunteer some concrete way of telling whether >a passage is "weepy" or not, my opinion will have to stand. > >The other point was IED's gross misinterpretation of my joke ("Skylarking" >is the number two album, but I don't know what the number one album is) >as an example of "sloppy thinking". GET REAL IED, CAN'T YOU TELL ATTEMPTED >HUMOR WHEN YOU READ IT?? Or maybe you could come down off your high horse >long enough to read a sentence twice and think about it logically: could >that phrase be interpreted as saying something like "well it's definitely >one of the best albums of the year, but I can't or don't feel like assigning >absolute ratings to them"? I think so. > >--Jon Drukman >"So *this* is why the hippies like paisley" > -first time acid tripper All of the above DID get through the first time. It didn't get lost, and it was all answered at length. >Sender: Paul Benjamin <Benjamin@HIS-PHOENIX-MULTICS.ARPA> >I don't wanna discuss the people that dance to the music. I wanna hear Ditto. >I wanna hear about the music itself. Same here. -- Andrew Marvick