Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1987-03 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: seismo!udenva!showard (Steve "Blore" Howard)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 87 14:37:20 mst
Subject: Excuse me?
> [IED:] The same is true of Kate Bush: despite the undeniable > importance of her innovations, it is the TIMELESS qualities of her > music -- the magic of her muse, so to speak -- which give her art > depth and lasting beauty. The innovations arise out of the needs of > the muse, but they are not the muse herself. Excuse me? I must not be reading this correctly. How can you call Kate Bush timeless? Her earliest music is barely a decade old. An earlier posting prompts me to write, but--and let me make this perfectly clear--ONLY IN JEST: "Listening to Kate Bush is a lot like staring at the sun--it's not a good idea." -- "The laws of nature don't work if there's nobody looking" Steve "Blore" Howard, Icon of Bad Taste {hplabs, seismo}!hao!udenva!showard or {boulder, cires, ucbvax!nbires, cisden}!udenva!showard