Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1986-12 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: "ROSSI J.A." <rossi@nusc.ARPA>
Date: 25 Jul 86 16:34:00 PST
Subject: The 'Not Long Awaited' Rossi Comments on SO
Reply-To: "ROSSI J.A." <rossi@nusc.ARPA>
Between reading the comments of L-H people and reading the reviews of SO in some of my more trusting places (e.g. Keyboard, Modern Recording, etc), I managed to not buy (or listen to sans Sledgehammer) PG #5. Well I picked up the cassette in Montreal Wed and I havent played much else in my car since. I feel that, by far, theis is Gabriel's best solo work to date. For the same reasons I am starting to enjoy Lionheart and Never For Ever much more than HoL, I find I like So. Many people have claimed that PGIII is the PGs of all PGs. Well, in much the same way that The Dreaming is probably Kate's most interesting work to date, there does seem to be room, even in a single artist's writings, for enough variance to put together a consistent product which probably appeals to two entirely seperate subgroups of music lovers. This is what I find in So. As for the claims that this is a commercial 'Sell-Out' album (based, I would have to supose on Sledgehammer alone, since I don't see much commercial Hit potential for anything else on the album except for, maybe, Don't Give Up, which with a convincing video become a a smash tearjerker ala Time After Time), I obviously see no indications of this. What I do hear is a welcome return to the Lamb Lies Down era Genesis phrasing in Gabriel's style which was missing from all but PGI (Sollsbury Hill in particular). The mere lack of the Keyboard influence of Larry Fast with the substitution of Gabriel's own style on the keyboards surely must add to the effect. I would have loved this to have been PGI instead of PGV. In truth, I do like PGIII a lot, but I like experimental things quite a bit. So hits that other side of my musical tastes, with its reliable rhythmic romps through melodically tasteful passages. I also like occassionally to listen to lyrics that remain poetic and contain no discernable alternate message which is hiding in rough symbolism (Sledgehammer is, of course, a comic exception to that last statement. That Voice Again, In Your Eyes, We do What Were told and especially the Thid id the Picture duet with Laurie Anderson are examples of the flowing Gabriel I've missed since Genesis. To even mention this LP in the same sentence with any of Phil Collins albums does it a diservice. As for the Don't Give Up debate. Kate does an appreciable job singing lyrics which were written by PG in a melody composed by PG. I don't see any special relevance for her role in the LP, however and I think her inclusion in Games Without Frontiers was much more appropriate. I really can't see Dolly Parton doing that vocal although I think I would have chosen somebody other than Kate, if it were my choice (Melanie would be my first choice and ? Oldfield who does work with Mike Oldfield and did the memorable vocal on Voyage of the Acolyte, second). I just guess I see a place for this sentimental type of thing, especially from Peter Gabriel who brought us to know and understand Rael in a similar manner. At any rate, now that he's satisfied my interests with the album I've been waiting for, for all I care he can go back to Shocking Monkeys, bizarre rhythms, and Larry Fast effects for PGVI. If there is any deep meaning in the album, it must be in the title. 'Man made light, at night, is very bright' John ------