Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1986-09 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: nessus (Doug Alan)
Date: Tue, 20 May 86 15:30:23 EDT
Subject: Re: CDs VS LPs
Regarding whether or not CDs are a sham.... Yes, they have their problems.... No, a CD will never sound as good as the first play of a perfectly recorded carefully cleaned record pressed on audiophile vinyl and played on an expensive and perfectly set-up turntable. On the other hand, it will probably sound better than the tenth play. No one makes DBX encoded records any more, and true audiophiles shudder at DBX anyway. Like CDs, it reduces noise at the expense of true high fidelity. Fildelity wise, records and CDs are pretty comparible. CDs, however, don't wear out, don't pop and click, and don't require careful handling. The little boxes suck, however. The only thing worse is cassette packaging (there Hofmann!) *The Dreaming* is sure to sound better on CD -- it was digitally mixed. All the 20KHz+ transients are already gone. Kate Bush said that she couldn't tell any difference in fidelity between digitally mixing it and analog mixing it. She chose digital, because she thought the slightly "crystaline" sound the digital distortion added was appropriate for the album. -Doug