Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1986-09 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Bob Krajewski <lmi-angel!rpk>
Date: Fri, 16 May 86 18:57:46 edt
Subject: Boys, Boys
Umm, in my ``Anti-Flame,'' I was enumerated poses that I thought were composed of at least 70% bogosity, though some of them have a grain of truth in them. It's directed mostly at the pat-on-the-back sceneness that the zine-droolers engage in. Lots of good (hey, great) American bands have been slaving away when the ``groovy train'' was nowhere to be found, and now that there's a reasonable grapevine and distribution network for independents (well most of them, anyway), Sturgeon's Law is more apparent than ever. My greeatest distress originates from that fact that there's this mythical American sound out there that marks you as being honest. Well, excuse me, but I just listen to the stuff. Hey, how ``American'' did Pylon sound ? Why do smug DJ's (and I'm not even talking about the usual spoon-fed cawlitch radio types here) say things like, ``Remember when we used to play reggae ?'' When REM were making their first rounds, it was OK for them to acknowledge New Order as an influence (not that any REM influence-elements would be easy to spot). Nowadays, I can't even convince a local hipster that this guy I met who plays in a tight funk band also likes Alex Chilton. Gosh, how could anybody be like that ? I do not include the hard/post-core community and all the other original misfits in this bunch. It's not even the few good bands caught in the whole stampede (though, sadly, the stampede is mostly towards the good ol' days). The music comes first, dammit. Let's talk a little about synths. First of all, I think there are a lot of synths that are cheaper than `good' guitars now. I also want to muse on sampling for a while. Of course ``post-modern'' types (hey, I can get in the mood for it !) like quote-power, the deconstructionist capabilities. I don't believe that this mode of music/art-construction is neccessarily wonderful, but in good hands, it can add undeniable sensual power while making its references. (As you can infer, I do like sounds, and lyrics are usually only of secondary importance.) There are very few machines that give as much control over really organic, dirty, and laden- with-meaning sounds as Fairlights and their ilk. The best context for these things seems to be ``real'' instruments, mostly acoustic. You should all be familiar with two examples: The Dreaming and the Hounds of Love. (I'd also like to throw in The Flat Earth by Thomas Dolby.) Rather Random Ripostes: Somebody mentioned Birdsongs of the Mesozoic as a band that used synths. Well, they do have a little Moog, a funky Roland drum box, and a Linn (the one new piece of equipment in two years), but everything is low-tech, like worn, comfortable electric tennis-shoes. I'm afraid the Cab's current approach is running out of steam: I find that two chunks (Crackdown and the Arm, the Sword...) are enough for me. Try something like Hula or Guerilla Warfare (hope I got the name right) from Canada instead. Hey, is your local college radio outlet going to play a record by a group that does Wild Cherry and Ohio Players covers ? (Well, if RUN-DMC can do Aerosmith...)